Archive for the 'review' Category

Mixed review

Amusé?

We had a good night, but with a few reservations.

Firstly, the restaurant was way too dark. Q: How do you know a restaurant is too dark? A: When the waiter has to hand you a penlight so you can read your menu!

Secondly, the food. It seems almost churlish to say anything negative about the food, which was very good. The problem? The flavours were really really strong. This was especially so for our main course, which was a vegetable tagine complete with artichokes, figs, baby carrots and a few other things I could not identify. Strong flavours are not normally something I’d criticise, but in this case they were so strong the flavour of the vegetables was overwhelmed. And, because it was so dark, I couldn’t see what I was eating!

Thirdly, the waiters. Oh, they were attentive and unobtrusive, but if I may make one suggestion, it’s that as a waiter one should enunciate clearly and take one’s time when serving, and not rush one’s description of the dishes. Especially when it comes to dishes that are not listed on the menu - I can’t quite tell you what I had for our amuse bouche - I think it was a grapefruity gin and tonic inspired cold soup (the chef is probably cringing at my poor palate and poor description). I could have called them back and asked them to repeat their descriptions, but they always moved away so efficiently I would have had to raise my voice or gesture to call them back (and they were always standing at the opposite side of the room!).

However, I thought the quality of the food was excellent. The butter was beautiful. I always enjoy it when we eat out and there’s real butter. Because I seldom eat it I have no guilt about slathering it over my bread when I do have it. My entree, a mushroom risotto, was very good (where can you buy porcini mushrooms in Perth?). In fact, I might have enjoyed the risotto better as my main course, the flavours of the tagine were so strong I couldn’t actually finish it. The deserts were good - the pre-desert, a coffee mousse, was very light and very good, and we had a very lovely blood plum frangipane tart with peach ice cream.

And I think it’s great that they cater for vegetarians.

The Year in Sentences

Meme: Post the first line of your first journal entry of each month for 2007. I don’t write regularly enough in my paper journal for this, so I’ll use this blog. Via No Feeling of Falling (the blog of Maureen McHugh, author of China Mountain Zhang. I think Maureen looked over her blog too.)

December: While tidying my study, I found, and started reading, a library book I’d forgotten I’d borrowed: The Top Ten: Writers pick their favorite books, edited by J. Peder Zane.

November: Have just closed off comments and trackbacks - seem to be getting a lot of spam at the moment.

October: Recently read A long way gone by Ishmael Beah.

September: Am still trying to write up Stephen Abram’s talk, which I attended on Friday.

August: Bloggers, care to share with me the reasons you blog?

July: I’m still pondering/processing Barcamp.

June: If you are interested in this whole Web/Library 2.0 malarkey and would like to have coffee with a bunch of us, come on down to the XWray in Fremantle at 3-13 Essex Street, tomorrow (Saturday 2 June) at 3pm.

May: I wasn’t sure if I was going to be able to name another blog in this list this morning (we had a late night - puppy school then a birthday party) but it’s easy: blog number two out of five blogs that make me think is No Impact Man.

April: A terribly busy weekend, with two birthday celebrations and much running around after Paco.

March: I had the task of looking through a couple of boxes of books donated to the library yesterday.

February: My grandmother is still in hospital. [The worst month.]

January: I did this last year - it satisfies my enjoyment of making lists.

Nice way of looking over the year. I seem to have told myself that I haven’t done or achieved much this year. I think it’s time to let up on myself, somehow…

What’s your year been like?

Pet peeve

One thing that always annoys me when I’m reading, is when I keep reading a book because I keep hoping it’s going to get better, and then I realise that it’s not going to get any better, but I’ve gone past the point where I feel like I can give up on the book. You know, when you’ve invested too much time and energy into the book to just abandon it, and you just want to know how the darn thing ends.

This is the case with the book I am currently reading: Footfall by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle. It’s about aliens landing on earth, aliens with less-than-friendly intentions. Normally I enjoy this sort of thing, but not in this case:

  • The aliens, which look like elephants with two trunks, seem like caricatures. It doesn’t help that their names strike me as silly: K’turfookeph, Fookerteh, Raztupisp-minz…
  • There are way too many human characters, and they aren’t really developed.
  • The writing is plain narrative with nothing particularly inspiring or interesting about it. The whole thing reads like a B-grade television mini series, something you can watch while doing something else, without ever caring too much for the story or the characters.

I much prefer books that are so bad I abandon them after the first few pages. At least I don’t waste any time on them!