IE 7 ruined my Keeping Up to Date, database alerts/RSS class. It was the only browser available on the computers in the library training room, and the fact that it automatically, neatly handles RSS feeds and displays them in a nice readable manner meant that I couldn’t make my point that (for non-IE 7 users) RSS feeds display as almost unreadable, very off-putting gibberish. I shouldn’t grumble too much, as this just shows that I wasn’t as prepared as I should have been.
I mentioned that I wasn’t sure what online RSS reader to show the class - I ended up showing them both Google Reader and Bloglines. Of course I pointed out IE 7’s built-in reader - but I left it at that. None of the attendees were already using IE 7. (I could have asked about Firefox, I suppose, I don’t know why I didn’t.) Although this class was different in that four of the sixteen attendees had actually heard of RSS (usually none of the class will have heard of it), I could see that many of them were finding the concept a bit difficult to grasp. Still, a few of the students looked mildly interested, and one student actually stayed behind, set up her reader (Google) and confirmed with me that a New Zealand news site she was interested in subscribing to had no feeds.
One of the attendees who knew a bit about RSS had a chat with me about why I thought people aren’t using RSS more widely. I think that RSS isn’t as easy to use as it could be, although this is changing with aggregator options being built into email clients and web browsers. I also think that using RSS hasn’t become habitual, like email is. Whenever I’ve shown people email and RSS as options for keeping informed, the majority are quite happy to use email to receive alerts and subscriptions, but seem to baulk at the thought of having to check Something Else.
How much resistance was there to using email when The Internet first entered the popular consciousness? I seem to remember that there was some, but I could be imagining things. Anyone know?


